4.5 Article

Liquid-liquid equilibrium data for ternary systems of water plus acetic acid plus acetate esters at 293.2 K and 303.2 K and approximate to 95 kPa

Journal

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
Volume 463, Issue -, Pages 34-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.02.003

Keywords

Acetic acid; Density; Refractive index; Liquid-liquid equilibrium; NRTL

Funding

  1. CAPES Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel [23038.007211/2012-93]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid-liquid equilibrium data for water + acetic acid + [ethyl or butyl or isobutyl of isoamyl or heptyl acetate) systems at T= {293.2 and 313.2} K and atmospheric pressure (P approximate to 95 kPa) were determined by density and refractive index measurements. Binodal curves were constructed utilizing cloud point method and tie lines were determined using equations obtained through cloud point data fit. Partition coefficients, ester selectivities and percent of extraction were calculated in order to compare the solvents employed. It was verified that immiscibility region increases in the order: ethyl < butyl approximate to isobutyl < isoamyl < heptyl. Partition coefficients were higher for systems with ethyl acetate. Selectivity values achieved were all above 1, and heptyl acetate presented greater values among all solvents studied. Percent of extraction for acetic acid feed molar between 0.05 and 0.12 is greater for ethyl acetate; from 0.12 to 0.20, it is greater for butyl acetate; and, from 0.24 to 0.30, only data for heptyl could be determined. Different temperatures utilized did not presented significant variation in the results obtained. Experimental data were correlated with NRTL model, presenting root mean square deviation equal to 1.074 for 55 tie lines. NRTL was also used to estimate plait points for all systems. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available