4.4 Article

Direct Numerical Simulation of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in a Non-Axisymmetric Stenosis Model for Newtonian vs. Shear-Thinning Non-Newtonian Rheologies

Journal

FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 43-72

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-018-9905-7

Keywords

Stenosis; Shear-thinning; CFD; DNS; Transition; Turbulence; Hemodynamics

Funding

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation under Compute Canada
  2. Government of Ontario
  3. Ontario Research Fund -Research Excellence
  4. University of Toronto
  5. Research Council of Norway through a Centres of Excellence grant [179578]
  6. Centre for Cardiological Innovation
  7. Research Council of Norway
  8. Barbara and Frank Millgan Fellowship
  9. Weber and Mariano Scholarship
  10. Mary Gertrude I' Anson Scholarship
  11. Frank Howard Fellowships
  12. Simula Research Laboratory Fellowship
  13. Heart & Stroke Foundation [G-13-0001830, MC7455]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steady inflow through a non-axisymmetric stenotic model at Re =500-1000 for Newtonian and shear-thinning non-Newtonian rheologies was studied numerically to investigate the experimental evidence of stabilizing effect of shear-thinning fluids. A minimally-dissipative and energy-preserving finite-element based code was used, and results were verified against a higher-order spectral element code. Below a critical Reynolds number (Re-crit), both rheology models showed non-stationary and intermittent flow in time, with successive phases of laminar and turbulent regions that were quasi-periodic with long observation times. Using the conventional definition of Reynolds number based on high-shear viscosity, transition was delayed for the shear-thinning model, with Re-crit of 760 vs. 700 for the Newtonian rheology, a delay broadly consistent with previous reports. However, using domain-averaged viscosity aposteriori, the Re-crit for the shear-thinning model dropped to 710, closer to the Newtonian value. The transition process and the vortical structures for both rheologies were similar, albeit with some differences in the turbulent kinetic energy and evolution of non-stationary perturbations near the transition point. This suggests that previously-reported delays in transition to turbulence for blood vs. Newtonian fluids may be due to rheological factors other than shear-thinning, such as viscoelasticity. Our study also further highlights the challenges of defining non-Newtonian Reynolds numbers for flows in non-trivial geometries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available