4.7 Article

Different concentrations of Edwardsiella tarda ghost vaccine induces immune responses in vivo and protects Sparus macrocephalus against a homologous challenge

Journal

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue -, Pages 467-472

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.06.034

Keywords

Edwardsiella tarda; Bacterial ghosts; Sparus microcephalus; Humoral immunity; Cellular immunity; Non-specific immunity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31402325]
  2. Funds of Shandong Double Tops Program
  3. earmarked fund for the Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System in Shandong Province [SDAIT-14-07, SDAIT-13-2]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201708370021]
  5. special funds from the central finance to support the development of local universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial ghosts (BGs) can be generated by the controlled expression of the PhiX174 lysis gene E in gram-negative bacteria. They are intriguing vaccine candidates since ghosts retain functional antigenic cellular determinants often lost during traditional inactivation procedures. Here we prepared Edwardsiella tarda ghost (ETG) and tested different concentrations in vaccination trials. The results showed that serum IgM antibody titers were significantly higher in three different concentration immunization groups than control group (P < 0.05), However, there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference between the immunized groups. The phagocytic percentage (PP) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in ETG immunized groups than in the control group from 3 days post-treatment. The PP continued to rise with time until day 21, when the values of three ETG immunized groups were 45.7%, 51.2% and 50.7%, respectively. In addition, phagocytic index (PI) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in ETG immunized groups than in the control group after 7 days post-treatment. However, there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference of PP or PI between immunized groups. In addition, non-specific immune immunity, such as acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, superoxide dismutase and lysozyme activities displayed a similar pattern in all immunized groups, all immunized fish showed significantly higher activities than control group fish (P < 0.05). Most importantly three ETG immunized groups were all significantly more protected against the E. tarda challenge (19/25, 76% survival), (21/25, 84% survival) and (20/25, 80% survival) respectively, compared to (9/25, 36% survival) survival in the control group, but there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference of survival rate (SR) or relative percent survival (RPS) between immunized groups. All these results suggest that an ETG could stimulate cellular and humoral immunity, and could be used as a vaccine candidate in S.m. In summary, ETG can protect fish from Edwardsiellosis, and there is no significant difference in SR and RPS when three different concentrations of ETG are used, so it can easily be developed as a vaccine for mechanical and artificial operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available