4.7 Article

Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages 89-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.033

Keywords

Blastocyst; cleavage; frozen embryo transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate whether there is a difference in obstetrical and perinatal outcomes in blastocyst frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FETs) compared with cleavage-stage FET. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Women undergoing autologous FETs at either the blastocyst stage (n = 118,572) or the cleavage stage (n = 117,619) reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology in the years 2004-2013. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth, gestational age, birth weight, miscarriage. Result(s): After controlling for confounders, there were a 49% increased odds of live birth after blastocyst-stage FET compared with cleavage-stage FET (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44, 1.54). Additionally, blastocyst FET was associated with a 68% (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.63, 1.74) increased odds of clinical pregnancy and an 7% (OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88, 0.92) decreased odds of miscarriage. There was also a 16% increased odds of preterm delivery (OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06, 1.27) after blastocyst FET but no difference in birth weights. Conclusion(s): In patients undergoing FET, blastocyst-stage transfer is associated with higher live-birth rates when compared with cleavage-stage transfers. Furthermore, perinatal outcomes are similar between the groups. (C) 2018 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available