4.7 Article

C-Reactive protein in relation to fecundability and anovulation among eumenorrheic women

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 232-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.025

Keywords

C-Reactive protein; inflammation; anovulation; fertility; prospective studies

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [HHSN267200603423, HH5N267200603424, HHSN267200603426]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess systemic inflammation in relation to fecundability and anovulation.& para;& para;Design: Prospective cohort study among participants in the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial who were assigned to the placebo. Setting: Academic medical centers. Patient(s): Healthy eumenorrheic women (n = 572), 18-40 years of age, with one or two pregnancy losses, attempting spontaneous pregnancy. Intervention(s): Baseline serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) values <10 mg/L were categorized into tertiles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Discrete Cox proportional hazards models estimated the fecundability odds ratio (FOR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) and adjusted for potential confounders. Log-binomial regression estimated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI of anovulation. The algorithm to define anovulation used data on urinary concentrations of hCG, pregnanediol-3-glucuronide, and LH as well as fertility monitor readings. Result(s): Higher hsCRP was associated with reduced fecundability but not with an increased risk of anovulation. Conclusion(s): Among healthy women attempting pregnancy after one or two pregnancy losses, we found preliminary evidence that systemic inflammation is associated with reduced fecundability, but not independently from adiposity. Sporadic anovulation did not appear to drive this association. (C) 2017 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available