4.5 Article

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of opicapone for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 353-360

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1430138

Keywords

Opicapone; COMT inhibition; L-DOPA; Parkinson's disease; pharmacokinetic; motor fluctuations

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [175090]
  2. SASA project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Opicapone (OPC) is a novel, potent, reversible, and purely peripheral third-generation COMT inhibitor, which provides an enhancement in levodopa (L-Dopa) availability. It represents adjunctive therapy for L-Dopa treated patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Areas covered: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic of OPC for the treatment of PD. Expert commentary: Oral OPC exhibits linear, dose-dependent absorption. However, following concomitant ingestion of a high-fat, high-calorie meal, the maximum plasma concentration will be decreased. A once-daily bedtime administration of OPC 1h after the last daily L-Dopa/AADCi, are considered to avoid any interaction during the L-Dopa absorption phase. There are no clinically relevant effects of age (in adults), renal impairment or race on the pharmacokinetics of OPC. OPC dose adjustment is not needed in patients with mild to moderate chronic hepatic impairment. Opicapone exhibits the lowest potential for cytotoxicity in comparison with other COMT inhibitors. It significantly decreases COMT activity, with half-life of COMT inhibition in human erythrocytes of 61.6h and increases systemic exposure to L-Dopa. This provides an enhancement in L-Dopa availability that translates into clinical benefit for PD patients in terms of significant decrease of OFF periods and increase in ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available