4.3 Review

Maintaining consistent quality and clinical performance of biopharmaceuticals

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 369-379

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1421169

Keywords

Biopharmaceutical; biosimilar; consistency; drift; equivalence; manufacturing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Biopharmaceuticals are large protein based drugs which are heterogeneous by nature due to post translational modifications resulting from cellular production, processing and storage. Changes in the abundance of different variants over time are inherent to biopharmaceuticals due to their sensitivity to subtle process differences and the necessity for regular manufacturing changes. Product variability must thus be carefully controlled to ensure that it does not result in changes in safety or efficacy.Areas covered: The focus of this manuscript is to provide improved understanding of the science and strategies used to maintain the quality and clinical performance of biopharmaceuticals, including biosimilars, throughout their lifecycle. This review summarizes rare historical instances where clinically relevant changes have occurred, defined here as clinical drift, and discusses modern tools used to prevent such changes, including improved analytics, quality systems and regulatory frameworks.Expert opinion: Despite their size complexity and heterogeneity, modern analytics, manufacturing quality systems and comparability requirements for the evaluation of manufacturing changes cumulatively help to ensure the consistent quality and clinical performance of biopharmaceuticals throughout their product lifecycle. Physicians and patients can expect the same safety and efficacy from biopharmaceuticals and their respective biosimilars irrespective of batch or production history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Review Oncology

Clinical equivalence with G-CSF biosimilars: methodologic approach in a (neo)adjuvant setting in non-metastatic breast cancer

A. Krendyukov, M. Schiestl, N. Hoebel, M. Aapro

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER (2018)

Article Oncology

The in-use stability of the rituximab biosimilar Rixathon®/Riximyo® upon preparation for intravenous infusion

William C. Lamanna, Katharina Heller, Daniel Schneider, Raffaele Guerrasio, Veronika Hampl, Cornelius Fritsch, Martin Schiestl

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE (2019)

Review Oncology

Epoetin Biosimilars in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: 10 Years' Experience Gained

Matti Aapro, Andriy Krendyukov, Martin Schiestl, Pere Gascon

BIODRUGS (2018)

Correction Oncology

Epoetin Biosimilars in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: 10 Years' Experience Gained (vol 32, pg 129, 2018)

Matti Aapro, Andriy Krendyukov, Martin Schiestl, Pere Gascon

BIODRUGS (2018)

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Epoetin Biosimilars in the Treatment of Renal Anemia: What Have We Learned from a Decade of European Experience?

David Goldsmith, Frank Dellanna, Martin Schiestl, Andriy Krendyukov, Christian Combe

CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION (2018)

Review Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Switching Reference Medicines to Biosimilars: A Systematic Literature Review of Clinical Outcomes

Hillel P. Cohen, Andrew Blauvelt, Robert M. Rifkin, Silvio Danese, Sameer B. Gokhale, Gillian Woollett

DRUGS (2018)

Letter Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Authors' Reply to Pires et al.: Switching Reference Medicines to Biosimilars: A Systematic Literature Review of Clinical Outcomes''

Hillel P. Cohen, Andrew Blauvelt, Robert M. Rifkin, Silvio Danese, Sameer B. Gokhale, Gillian Woollett

DRUGS (2018)

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

The Assessment of Quality Attributes for Biosimilars: a Statistical Perspective on Current Practice and a Proposal

Johanna Mielke, Franz Innerbichler, Martin Schiestl, Nicolas M. Ballarini, Byron Jones

AAPS JOURNAL (2019)

Review Oncology

The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development

Martin Schiestl, Gopinath Ranganna, Keith Watson, Byoungin Jung, Karsten Roth, Bjoern Capsius, Michael Trieb, Peter Bias, Julie Marechal-Jamil

BIODRUGS (2020)

Article Oncology

The Importance of Countering Biosimilar Disparagement and Misinformation

Hillel P. Cohen, Dorothy McCabe

BIODRUGS (2020)

Review Oncology

Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies

Hillel P. Cohen, Sohaib Hachaichi, Wolfram Bodenmueller, Tore K. Kvien, Silvio Danese, Andrew Blauvelt

Summary: This paper reviews the evidence on whether switching between biosimilars of the same reference biologic provides similar safety and efficacy profiles, and finds that there is no reduction in effectiveness or increase in adverse events during the switching process.

BIODRUGS (2022)

Article Oncology

Future Evolution of Biosimilar Development by Application of Current Science and Available Evidence: The Developer's Perspective

Hillel P. P. Cohen, Matthew Turner, Dorothy McCabe, Gillian R. R. Woollett

Summary: Biosimilars have been approved in the USA for over a decade and in Europe for almost two decades, playing a crucial role in improving patient access to healthcare. However, accessibility to biological therapies remains a challenge in some markets. To address this, it is important to streamline the development process of biosimilars without compromising their quality, safety, or efficacy.

BIODRUGS (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Long-Term Real-World Post-approval Safety Data of Multiple Biosimilars from One Marketing-Authorization Holder After More than 18 Years Since Their First Biosimilar Launch

Sreedhar Sagi, Pradeep Anjaneya, Sameer Kalsekar, Andrea Kottke, Hillel P. Cohen

Summary: This study reviewed post-approval pharmacovigilance data for eight marketed biosimilars from one MAH, demonstrating that these biosimilars can be used as safely as their respective reference biologics for up to 18 years in a real-world setting. The long-term safety of biosimilars shown in this study provides strong support for the concept of biosimilarity and suggests that similar conclusions about safety may be reached for other biosimilars developed and approved to high standards by major health authorities like EMA and FDA.

DRUG SAFETY (2023)

Letter Health Policy & Services

Comment on Hernandez-Vasquez et al., a bibliometric analysis of the global research on biosimilars

Hillel P. Cohen

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE (2018)

No Data Available