4.3 Article

Cornuvesica: A little known mycophilic genus with a unique biology and unexpected new species

Journal

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages 615-630

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.03.007

Keywords

Ceratocystidaceae; Culture enrichment; Commensal symbiosis; Ferric chloride; Insect-associated fungi; Microascales

Categories

Funding

  1. DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB), South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the biology of the monotypic genus Cornuvesica (Microascales), apart from that isolates are notoriously difficult to culture on artificial media. A recent collection of material resembling this genus from freshly made wounds on Gmelina arborea in Indonesia, provided an opportunity to reconsider all available material of Cornuvesica falcata, type species of the genus. In addition to morphological comparisons, multigene phylogenetic analyses were made using sequences of the SSU, ITS, LSU and TEF-1 alpha genes. Our results showed that the holotype of Cor. falcata from pine in Canada differed from all other material previously considered to represent this species and also from the new Indonesian collections. The collections considered represented three additional species that we describe here as new. Three New Zealand isolates and an isolate from UK were respectively described as Cor. acuminata and Cor. crypta, while the Indonesian isolates were described as Cor. magnispora. Phylogenies based on the SSU and LSU data sets showed that Cornuvesica spp. do not belong in the Ceratocystidaceae as previously suggested, but represent a distinct lineage in the Microascales that has yet to be named. Results showed that culture filtrates from other fungi or ferric chloride markedly stimulated the growth of Cor. magnispora. (C) 2015 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available