4.1 Article

PERENNIAL GRAINS FOR AFRICA: POSSIBILITY OR PIPEDREAM?

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 251-272

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0014479718000066

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1076311]
  2. Global Center for Food Systems Innovation - USAID
  3. Irish Aid
  4. USAID
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1076311] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perennial grain crops have been proposed as a transformative approach to agriculture. Replacing annual staple crops with perennialized growth types of the same crops could provide environmental services, improve labour efficiency and weather resilience, reduce seed costs and produce livestock fodder or fuelwood production. Yet, the technologies and science for agricultural development in Africa have focused almost exclusively on annuals. In this paper, we review the literature to explore what has been potentially overlooked, including missed opportunities as well as the disadvantages associated with perennial grains. The case studies of pigeon pea and sorghum are considered, as an analogue for perennial grain crops in Africa. We find that a substantial number of farmers persist in 'perennializing' pigeon pea systems through ratoon management, and that sorghum ratoons are widely practiced in some regions. In contrast, many crop scientists are not interested in perennial traits or ratoon management, citing the potential of perennials to harbour disease, and modest yield potential. Indeed, an overriding prioritization of high grain yield response to fertilizer, and not including accessory products such as fodder or soil fertility, has led to multipurpose, perennial life forms being overlooked. Agronomists are encouraged to consider a wide range of indicators of performance for a sustainable approach to agriculture, one that includes management for diversity in crop growth habits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available