4.7 Article

An experimental study of heterogeneous NO reduction by biomass reburning

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 111-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.039

Keywords

Biomass; Reburning; NO reduction; Heterogeneous reduction; Homogeneous reduction

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2012AA062505, 2012AA06A113]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014 M561025]
  3. Central Research Institutes of Basic Research and Public Service Special Operations [2013-YSKY-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of different kinds of biomasses and their chars, as well as the effects of rebuming zone stoichiometry (SR2), reaction temperature, initial NO concentration and gas residence time in the reburning zone on NO reduction were systematically investigated in a one-dimensional dropping-tube furnace. The influences of inlet CO, SO2 and H2O with various concentrations on the NO reductions of sawdust and its chars were also evaluated to improve the understanding of the heterogeneous NO reduction mechanisms. The results showed that NO reductions of biomass and its chars increased with decreasing SR2, and with increasing volatile content, reaction temperature, initial NO concentration and gas residence time. The char contribution to the total NO reduction was enhanced with decreasing reaction temperature, and with increasing volatile content, SR2, initial NO concentration and gas residence time. After short residence times, homogeneous NO reduction process was the main mechanism. After long residence times, heterogeneous NO reduction process became dominated. For sawdust reburning, the char contribution to the total NO reduction was in the range of 56-79% at the SR2 = 0.6-1.05. The char contribution was found to be enhanced by the introduction of several gaseous species (e.g., CO, SO2 or water vapor). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available