4.7 Article

The aminopyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile core for the design of new non-nucleoside-like agonists of the human adenosine A2B receptor

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 127-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.02.081

Keywords

G protein-coupled receptors; Adenosine A(2B) receptor agonists; Aminopyridine-3,5-dicarbonitriles; Ligand-adenosine receptor modelling studies

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR) [20103W4779_004]
  2. University of Florence (Italy)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new series of amino-3,5-dicyanopyridines (3-28) as analogues of the adenosine hA(2B) receptor agonist BAY60-6583 (compound 1) was synthesized. All the compounds that interact with the hA(2B) adenosine receptor display EC50 values in the range 9-350 nM behaving as partial agonists, with the only exception being the 2-{[4-(4-acetamidophenyl)-6-amino-3,5-dicyanopyridin-2-yl]thio)acetamide (8) which shows a full agonist profile. Moreover, the 2-[(1H-imidazol-2-Amethylthio)]-6-amino-4-(4-cyclopropylmethoxy-phenyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile (15) turns out to be 3-fold more active than 1 although less selective. This result can be considered a real breakthrough due to the currently limited number of non-adenosine hA(2B) AR agonists reported in literature. To simulate the binding mode of nucleoside and non-nucleoside agonists at the hA(2B) AR, molecular docking studies were performed at homology models of this AR subtype developed by using two crystal structures of agonist-bound A(2A) AR as templates. These investigations allowed us to represent a hypothetical binding mode of hA(2B) receptor agonists belonging to the amino-3,5-dicyanopyridine series and to rationalize the observed SAR. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available