4.5 Article

Tubulinopathies continued: refining the phenotypic spectrum associated with variants in TUBG1

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1132-1142

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0146-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Senior Clinical Investigator Fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
  2. Scientific Fund Willy Gepts
  3. VUB Wetenschappelijk Steunfonds
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) [DI 2079/2-1, DI 2170/2-2]
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institutes of Health [P01NS039404, R01NS050375, 1R01NS058721, 1R01NS092772]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tubulinopathies are a heterogeneous group of conditions with a wide spectrum of clinical severity resulting from variants in genes of the tubulin superfamily. Variants in TUBG1 have been described in three patients with posterior predominant pachygyria and microcephaly. We here report eight additional patients with four novel heterozygous variants in TUBG1 identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. All had severe motor and cognitive impairment and all except one developed seizures in early life. The core imaging features included a pachygyric cortex with posterior to anterior gradient, enlarged lateral ventricles most pronounced over the posterior horns, and variable degrees of reduced white matter volume. Basal ganglia, corpus callosum, brainstem, and cerebellum were often normal, in contrast to patients with variants in other tubulin genes where these structures are frequently malformed. The imaging phenotype associated with variants in TUBG1 is therefore more in line with the phenotype resulting from variants in LIS1 (a. k. a. PAFAH1B1). This difference may, at least in part, be explained by gamma-tubulin's physiological function in microtubule nucleation, which differs from that of alpha and beta-tubulin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available