4.7 Article

Petrophysical and geomechanical characteristics of Canadian tight oil and liquid-rich gas reservoirs: II. Geomechanical property estimation

Journal

FUEL
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages 682-691

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.113

Keywords

Porosity; Permeability; Canadian tight oil/gas; Geomechanics

Funding

  1. Seven Generations Energy Ltd.
  2. Crescent Point Energy (Corp.)
  3. University of Calgary
  4. NSERC
  5. Tight Oil Consortium at the University of Calgary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results from an ongoing laboratory study investigating geomechanical characteristics of the Montney and Bakken formations in Canada are presented. The primary objectives are to (1) characterize the basic geomechanical properties of these formations in areas with limited datasets and (2) investigate the interrelationship between various petrophysical and geomechanical characteristics of these fine-grained tight reservoirs. For two petrophysically well-characterized core slabs from Montney and Bakken formations (Part I), mechanical hardness tests were performed using a portable Equotip (R) Piccolo 2 hardness tool at the same spots as profile permeability tests. For Montney core slabs, the mechanical hardness values range between 590 and 820 HLD, while for Bakken core slabs, the mechanical hardness values range between 480 and 640 HLD. The mechanical hardness data are roughly correlated to profile permeability values; permeability decreases with increasing mechanical hardness. Using mechanical hardness data and available correlations in the literature, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) values are further estimated for the analyzed core slabs. The obtained interrelationships between mechanical hardness, profile permeability and UCS data can be used to roughly predict permeability profile and mechanical stratigraphy along the drilled core by performing simple, inexpensive, fast mechanical hardness tests. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available