4.4 Article

Daily Assessment of Stressful events and Coping in early post-operative recovery after colorectal cancer surgery

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12829

Keywords

colorectal cancer; coping; patient education; Person-centred care; post-operative recovery; surgery

Funding

  1. University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-centred Care (GPCC)
  2. Health & Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Vastra Gotaland, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes the most stressful events and coping strategies used by patients with colorectal cancer 4-6weeks after surgery and whether the coping strategies were considered helpful or not. For the investigation of situational coping, an exploratory design was used. One hundred and five patients from three Swedish hospitals were included to fill in the Daily Coping Assessment. Most stressful event, number and types of pre-defined coping strategies used, and if the coping strategy used was considered helpful or not, were measured for 5days. Of 523 diary entries, 180 reported no stressful events. The most stressful event, also with worst level of control and expectation, was Pain, followed by Nausea/vomiting. The areas causing most stressful events were Bowel-related and Surgery and treatment-related problems. Acceptance and Direct action were the most frequently used coping strategies. There was a wide range of perceived helpfulness if coping strategies were placed in relation to specific areas of events. The conclusion was that patients revealed several strategies for coping with stressful events but needed a higher level of preparedness for what might come and therefore need to be given appropriate support to cope during the early recovery phase. Such support is suggested to be person-centred and oriented towards individually adapting standardised regimens, given the variety of situations to which the stressful events reported in the study were related.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available