4.4 Article

Reliability of tensiomyography and myotonometry in detecting mechanical and contractile characteristics of the lumbar erector spinae in healthy volunteers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 7, Pages 1349-1359

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3867-2

Keywords

Paraspinal muscles; Mechanomyography; Repeatability; Muscle contraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tensiomyography (TM) (TMG) and MyotonPRO(A (R)) (MMT) are two non-invasive devices for monitoring muscle contractile and mechanical characteristics. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of TMG and MMT parameters for measuring (TMG:) muscle displacement (D (m)), contraction time (T (c)), and velocity (V (c)) and (MMT:) frequency (F), stiffness (S), and decrement (D) of the erector spinae muscles (ES) in healthy adults. A particular focus was set on the establishment of reliability measures for the previously barely evaluated secondary TMG parameter V (c). Twenty-four subjects (13 female and 11 male, mean +/- SD, 38.0 +/- 12.0 years) were measured using TMG and MMT over 2 consecutive days. Absolute and relative reliability was calculated by standard error of measurement (SEM, SEM%), Minimum detectable change (MDC, MDC%), coefficient of variation (CV%) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 3.1) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The ICCs for all variables and test-retest intervals ranged from 0.75 to 0.99 indicating a good to excellent relative reliability for both TMG and MMT, demonstrating the lowest values for TMG T (c) and between-day MMT D (ICC < 0.90). Absolute reliability was suitable for all parameters (CV 2-8%) except for D (m) (10-12%). V (c) demonstrated to be the most reliable and repeatable TMG parameter (ICC > 0.95, CV < 8%). The reliability for TMG V (c) could be established successfully. Its further applicability needs to be confirmed in future studies. MMT was found to be more reliable on repeated testing than the two other TMG parameters D (m) and T (c).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available