4.8 Article

Impact of Environmental Radiation on the Health and Reproductive Status of Fish from Chernobyl

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 16, Pages 9442-9450

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02378

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Environment Agency
  2. Radioactive Waste Management Ltd (NERC grant) [NE/L000393/1]
  3. NERC [NE/L000318/1, NE/L000393/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aquatic organisms at Chernobyl have now been chronically exposed to environmental radiation for three decades. The biological effects of acute exposure to radiation are relatively well documented, but much less is known about the long-term effects of chronic exposure of organisms in their natural environment. Highly exposed fish in freshwater systems at Chernobyl showed morphological changes in their reproductive system in the years after the accident. However, the relatively limited scope of past studies did not allow robust conclusions to be drawn. Moreover, the level of the radiation dose at which significant effects on wildlife occur is still under debate. In the most comprehensive evaluation of the effects of chronic radiation on wild fish populations to date, the present study measures specific activities of Cs-137, Sr-90, and transuranium elements (Pu-238, Pu-239,Pu-240, and Am-241), index conditions, distribution and size of oocytes, as well as environmental and biological confounding factors in two fish species perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) from seven lakes. In addition, relative species abundance was examined. The results showed that both fish species are, perhaps surprisingly, in good general physiological and reproductive health. Perch, however, appeared to be more sensitive to radiation than roach: in the most contaminated lakes, a delay of the maturation of the gonads and the presence of several undeveloped phenotypes were evident only for perch and not for roach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available