4.6 Article

Widespread nitrogen fixation in sediments from diverse deep-sea sites of elevated carbon loading

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 4281-4296

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14342

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) [3780]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research [DE-SC0003940, DE-SC0004949]
  3. National Science Foundation [MCB-0348492, OCE-1634297]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen fixation, the biological conversion of N-2 to NH3, is critical to alleviating nitrogen limitation in many marine ecosystems. To date, few measurements exist of N-2 fixation in deep-sea sediments. Here, we conducted > 400 bottle incubations with sediments from methane seeps, whale falls and background sites off the western coast of the United States from 600 to 2893 m water depth to investigate the potential rates, spatial distribution and biological mediators of benthic N-2 fixation. We found that N-2 fixation was widespread, yet heterogeneously distributed with sediment depth at all sites. In some locations, rates exceeded previous measurements by > 10x, and provided up to 30% of the community anabolic growth requirement for nitrogen. Diazotrophic activity appeared to be inhibited by pore water ammonium: N-2 fixation was only observed if incubation ammonium concentrations were <= 25 mu M, and experimental additions of ammonium reduced diazotrophy. In seep sediments, N-2 fixation was dependent on CH4 and coincident with sulphate reduction, consistent with previous work showing diazotrophy by microorganisms mediating sulphate-coupled methane oxidation. However, the pattern of diazotrophy was different in whale-fall and associated reference sediments, where it was largely unaffected by CH4, suggesting catabolically different diazotrophs at these sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available