4.7 Article

Performance, combustion and knock assessment of a high compression ratio and lean-burn heavy-duty spark-ignition engine fuelled with n-butane and liquefied methane gas blend

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 256-268

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.014

Keywords

Lean combustion; Alternative fuel; Natural gas; Thermodynamic; Knocking

Funding

  1. National Science Technology Support Plan Projects [2014BAG09B01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51506050]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201706130033]
  4. Hunan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental investigation was conducted on the performance, combustion and knock characteristics of a high compression ratio, lean-burn heavy-duty spark ignition (SI) engine fuelled with n-butane and liquefied methane gas blend. Specifically, some technical adaptations were carried out on the original compression ignition (CI) engine for changing the direct fuel injection system into the electronic controlled intake port gas injection and implementing a high-energy ignition system. Results indicate that the in-cylinder pressure, heat release rate and cumulative heat release amount increase with the increased n-butane energy share. Once the n-butane energy ratio exceeds 5% in 1400 r/min, full-load, light knock occurs at this operating condition. In addition, the 50% burning location is advanced, the 10-90% combustion duration is shortened, and knocking intensity is strengthened. Furthermore, the maximum pressure rise rate fluctuates around the average value, and the oscillation amplitude also ascends with increased n-butane energy share which results in higher cycle-by-cycle variation. However, the IMEP and indicated thermal efficiency firstly go up with the increased percentage of the n-butane energy share and then decrease. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available