4.5 Article

Analysis of Integration of MEA-Based CO2 Capture and Solar Energy System for Coal-Based Power Plants Based on Thermo-Economic Structural Theory

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en11051284

Keywords

MEA-based CO2 capture; solar energy system; coal-fired power generation; thermo-economic theory

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB251505]
  2. China National Natural Science Foundation [51106048]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. 111 Project [B12034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Installing CO2 capture plants in coal-fired power stations will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help mitigate climate change. However, the deployment of this technology faces many obstacles-in particular, high energy consumption. Aiming to address this challenge, we investigated the integration of a solar energy system in a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant equipped with monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture (termed PG-CC) by comparing the thermo- economic performance of two integrated systems with that of PG-CC. In the first system, solar-aided coal-fired power generation equipped with MEA-based CO2 capture (SA-PG-CC), solar thermal was used to heat the high- pressure feed water in the power plant, while the reboiler duty of the capture plant's stripper was provided by extracted low-pressure steam from the power plant. The second system integrated the power plant with solar-aided MEA-based CO2 capture (SA-CC-PG), using solar thermal to heat the stripper's reboiler. Both systems were simulated in EBSILON Professional and Aspen Plus and analysed using thermo-economics theory. We then evaluated each system's thermodynamic and economic performance in terms of power generation and CO2 capture. Compared with PG-CC, the thermo-economic cost of electricity increased by 12.71% in SA-PG-CC and decreased by 9.77% in SA-CC-PG. The unit thermo-economic cost of CO2 was similar in both the PG-CC and SA-PG-CC systems, but significantly greater in SA-CC-PG. Overall, SA-PG-CC produced less power but used energy more effectively than SA-CC-PG. From a thermo- economic point of view, SA-PG-CC is therefore a better choice than SA-CC-PG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available