4.5 Article

Influence of Grain Size Heterogeneity and In-Situ Stress on the Hydraulic Fracturing Process by PFC2D Modeling

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en11061413

Keywords

hydraulic fracturing; grain size heterogeneity; in-situ stress; particle flow code; modified fluid-mechanically coupled model

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41572312, 41672321, 41502307]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB10050202]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A modified fluid-mechanically coupled algorithm in PFC2D was adopted in this article to study the influence of grain size heterogeneity and in-situ stress on hydraulic fracturing behavior. Simulated results showed that the in-situ stress and grain size heterogeneity significantly affect the initiation, growth, and spatial distribution of the hydraulic fractures: (1) the initiation and breakdown pressure are gradually reduced with the increase of the grain size heterogeneity; (2) with increased in-situ stress, the initiation and breakdown pressure increase, and the reduction effect of grain size heterogeneity on the breakdown pressure becomes more obvious; (3) in grain size homogeneous rock, the initiation pressure decreases with increasing in-situ stress ratio, however, the initiation pressure of grain size heterogeneous rock is almost unaffected by the in-situ stress ratio; (4) The in-situ stress ratio and grain size heterogeneity affect the spatial distribution of hydraulic fractures simultaneously. When the in-situ stress ratio is larger than 1, the hydraulic fractures propagate substantially along the direction of the maximum principal stress. When the in-situ stress ratio is 1, the initiation position and extension direction of hydraulic fractures are random and complex fracture networks can easily develop in a grain size homogeneous model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available