4.5 Article

INCREASED BONE TURNOVER IN TYPE 2 DIABETES PATIENTS RANDOMIZED TO BARIATRIC SURGERY VERSUS MEDICAL THERAPY AT 5 YEARS

Journal

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 256-264

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.4158/EP-2017-0072

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ethicon EndoSurgery (STAMPEDE) [NCT00432809]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of our study was to determine the 5-year outcomes of bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy on bone turnover in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from the STAMPEDE trial. Methods: This was an ancillary investigation of a 5-year randomized control trial at a single tertiary care center involving 95 patients aged 48.5 +/- 8 years with obesity (body mass index [BMI], 36.5 +/- 3.6 kg/m(2)) and uncontrolled T2DM (glycated hemoglobin 9.3 +/- 1.6% [78 mmol/mol]). Patients were randomized to intensive medical therapy (IMT; n = 25), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; n = 37), or sleeve gastrectomy (SG; n = 33) for diabetes treatment. Bone formation marker osteocalcin (OC), bone resorption marker serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were assessed at baseline and 5 years postintervention. Analysis with key clinical parameters and outcomes (i.e., age, menopausal status, gender, weight loss) was performed. Results: Percent change in CTX at 5 years increased in both surgical groups, by 137 +/- 108% in RYGB (P<.001) and 61.1 +/- 90% in SG (P<.001) compared to 29.8 +/- 93% in IMT (P=.12). OC also increased from baseline in the surgical cohorts, by 138 +/- 19% in RYGB (P<.001) and 71 +/- 69% in SG (P<.001) compared to 43.8 +/- 121.1% in IMT (P=.83). Increases in both CTX and OC correlated linearly with increases in PTH levels in RYGB patients (P<.001). Increase in CTX correlated with decreased BMI in SG patients (P=.039). Conclusion: In patients with T2DM, bone turnover remains chronically elevated at 5 years following RYGB, and to a lesser extent in SG patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available