4.8 Article

Using food network unfolding to evaluate food-web complexity in terms of biodiversity: theory and applications

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1065-1074

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12973

Keywords

Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratio; ecosystem functioning; food network unfolding; species diversity; trophic level; trophic position; trophic pyramid

Categories

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment [4D-1102]
  2. River Foundation [241215022, 251263018, 251263021]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency CREST Grant [JPMJCR13A3]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grants [25291101, 25660120, 16H02524]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H02524, 25660120] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food-web complexity often hinders disentangling functionally relevant aspects of food-web structure and its relationships to biodiversity. Here, we present a theoretical framework to evaluate food-web complexity in terms of biodiversity. Food network unfolding is a theoretical method to transform a complex food web into a linear food chain based on ecosystem processes. Based on this method, we can define three biodiversity indices, horizontal diversity (D-H), vertical diversity (D-V) and range diversity (D-R), which are associated with the species diversity within each trophic level, diversity of trophic levels, and diversity in resource use, respectively. These indices are related to Shannon's diversity index (H'), where H' = D-H + D-V - D-R. Application of the framework to three riverine macroinvertebrate communities revealed that D indices, calculated from biomass and stable isotope features, captured well the anthropogenic, seasonal, or other within-site changes in food-web structures that could not be captured with H' alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available