4.3 Article

Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with Type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership

Journal

DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 862-870

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dme.13613

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Diabetes UK
  2. Oxford BMRC
  3. Chairs the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme General Funding Board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo describe processes and outcomes of a priority setting partnership to identify the top 10 research priorities' in Type 2 diabetes, involving people living with the condition, their carers, and healthcare professionals. MethodsWe followed the four-step James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership process which involved: gathering uncertainties using a questionnaire survey distributed to 70 000 people living with Type 2 diabetes and their carers, and healthcare professionals; organizing the uncertainties; interim priority setting by resampling of participants with a second survey; and final priority setting in an independent group of participants, using the nominal group technique. At each step the steering group closely monitored and guided the process. ResultsIn the first survey, 8227 uncertainties were proposed by 2587 participants, of whom 18% were from black, Asian and minority ethnic groups. Uncertainties were formatted and collated into 114 indicative questions. A total of 1506 people contributed to a second survey, generating a shortlist of 24 questions equally weighted to the contributions of people living with diabetes and their carers and those of healthcare professionals. In the final step the top 10 research priorities' were selected, including questions on cure and reversal, risk identification and prevention, and self-management approaches in Type 2 diabetes. ConclusionSystematic and transparent methodology was used to identify research priorities in a large and genuine partnership of people with lived and professional experience of Type 2 diabetes. The top 10 questions represent consensus areas of research priority to guide future research, deliver responsive and strategic allocation of research resources, and improve the future health and well-being of people living with, and at risk of, Type 2 diabetes. What's new? We describe the largest research prioritization process for Type 2 diabetes to date and the first to consult extensively with healthcare professionals, people living with the condition and their carers in partnership. The process provides an authoritative resource to the academic community to guide research that has the potential to make a meaningful difference to people living with Type 2 diabetes and healthcare professionals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available