4.2 Review

How to best assess abdominal obesity

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000485

Keywords

computed tomography; MRI; three-dimensional body scanning; visceral adipose tissue

Funding

  1. Integrating Special Population Award on Body Composition after Bariatric Surgery [R01 AG045761, P30 DK26687, UL1TR000040]
  2. Irving Pilot Imaging Award on Quantification of Brown Adipose Tissue [UL1TR000040]
  3. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000040, UL1TR001873] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R21DK082937, R21DK073720, P30DK026687] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG045761] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewAbdominal obesity, especially the increase of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), is closely associated with increased mortality related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and fatty liver disease. This review provides an overview of the recent advances for abdominal obesity measurement.Recent findingsCompared to simple waist circumference, emerging three-dimensional (3D) body-scanning techniques also measure abdominal volume and shape. Abdominal dimension measures have been implemented in bioelectrical impedance analysis to improve accuracy when estimating VAT. Geometrical models have been applied in ultrasound to convert depth measurement into VAT area. Only computed tomography (CT) and MRI can provide direct measures of VAT. Recent advances in imaging allow for evaluating functional aspects of abdominal fat such as brown adipose tissue and fatty acid composition.SummaryWaist circumference is a simple, inexpensive method to measure abdominal obesity. CT and MRI are reference methods for measuring VAT. Further studies are needed to establish the accuracy for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in estimating longitudinal changes of VAT. Further studies are needed to establish whether bioelectrical impedance analysis, ultrasound, or 3D body scanning is consistently superior to waist circumference in estimating VAT in different populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available