4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of foamed concrete with Ti-extracted residues and red gypsum

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 109-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.072

Keywords

Foamed concrete; Ti-extracted residues; Red gypsum; Hydration kinetics; Mechanical characteristics; Microstructure

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Nonmetal Composites
  2. Functional Materials and Southwest University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recycling of Ti-extracted residues (TRs) and red gypsum (RG), which are the industrial wastes from titanium dioxide manufacturing industry, will avoid the increasing impact on the environment due to their difficulty for disposal. In this paper, the ternary blended binder mainly consisting of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), TRs and RG for the preparation of foamed concrete (FC) was formulated in the laboratory. The hydration kinetics of blended cement, mechanical characteristics and microstructure of FC were investigated. The results indicated that quick lime and sulfoaluminate cement (SAC) evidently reduced the setting time of the complex binder, but mechanical activation for TRs could not substantially shorten those of blended binder. In the case of FC, the optimum technological parameters were proposed as follows: OPC: TRs: RG = 10:45:45 (by mass, the same below), quick lime 2%, SAC 4%, Na2SO4 0.4%, water reducer 0.2%, foam 4.6% and WEB 0.60. The maximum compressive strength and specific strength of FC with density of 437 kg/m(3) reached up to 2.14 MPa and 4.91 kN center dot m/kg, respectively. Microstructure analysis revealed that the interconnected assemblages in FC are fioccular and petal-like hydrated gels, need-like ettringite and unreactive plate-like gypsum. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available