4.7 Article

Kernel machines and firefly algorithm based dynamic modulus prediction model for asphalt mixes considering aggregate morphology

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 408-416

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.133

Keywords

Dynamic modulus; Support vector regression; Firefly algorithm; Cumulative shape index factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial Intelligence algorithm support vector regression (SVR) has proved successful in outperforming conventional Witczak and ANN models for estimation of dynamic modulus (E*) of asphalt mixes. However, there were two issues related to the development of E* prediction models that the present study addresses. Firstly, since aggregates occupy almost 95% by weight of HMA, it is quite possible that the morphology of these aggregates play an important role in influencing the E* values. To address this issue, aggregate shape parameters, namely, angularity, sphericity, texture and form were used with aggregate gradation for stiffness estimation. Secondly, to fine tune the hyper-parameters firefly algorithm (FA) was coupled with SVR. E* tests of 20 HMA mixes having different sources, sizes of aggregates, and volumetric properties were conducted at 4 temperatures and 6 frequencies. Aggregate shape parameters were measured using the automated aggregate image measurement system (AIMS). SVR-FA models were developed that predicted the E* with an R-2 of 0.98. SVR-FA models were compared with SVR and ANN models for E* prediction. Further, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the important input parameters. Lastly, an approach for formulation of SVR-FA model equations for direct prediction of HMA stiffness is also discussed. FA proved instrumental in improving the efficiency of SVR by optimizing the hyper-parameters with lesser manual effort. Finally, it was concluded that SVR-FA algorithm is capable of successfully predicting the E* values using the aggregate shape parameters. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available