When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-04-30
DOI
10.1111/cobi.13123
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Publishing social science research in Conservation Biology to move beyond biology
- (2018) Tara L. Teel et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Perceptions across scales of governance and the Indonesian peatland fires
- (2017) Rachel Carmenta et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- Perceptions of environmental justice and the conflict surrounding large carnivore management in Norway — Implications for conflict management
- (2016) Kim S. Jacobsen et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Understanding conservationists’ perspectives on the new-conservation debate
- (2016) George Holmes et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management
- (2016) Nathan James Bennett CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives
- (2016) Aiora Zabala et al. PLoS One
- Mapping value plurality towards ecosystem services in the case of Norwegian wildlife management: A Q analysis
- (2015) Yennie K. Bredin et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Conflicting policy beliefs and informational complexities in designing a transboundary enforcement monitoring system
- (2015) Remi Chandran et al. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
- The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines
- (2015) Nibedita Mukherjee et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Institutional stakeholders’ views on jaguar conservation issues in central Brazil
- (2015) Yennie K. Bredin et al. Global Ecology and Conservation
- Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation
- (2014) Francine Madden et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Scientists, managers, and assisted colonization: Four contrasting perspectives entangle science and policy
- (2014) Mark W. Neff et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists
- (2014) KATIE MOON et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Ecosystem services concepts and approaches in conservation: Just a rhetorical tool?
- (2014) Janet A. Fisher et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Clarifying standpoints in the gray wolf recovery conflict: Procuring management and policy forethought
- (2013) Kristine E. Mazur et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Diverging viewpoints on tiger conservation: A Q-method study and survey of conservation professionals in India
- (2013) Archi Rastogi et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Human Perspectives and Conservation of Grizzly Bears in Banff National Park, Canada
- (2012) EMILY C. CHAMBERLAIN et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Shifting environmental perspectives in agriculture: Repeated Q analysis and the stability of preference structures
- (2012) Ben B. Davies et al. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
- Understanding and managing conservation conflicts
- (2012) Steve M. Redpath et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Negotiating uncertainty: Framing attitudes, prioritizing issues, and finding consensus in the coral reef environment management “crisis”
- (2010) Bärbel G. Bischof OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started