4.7 Article

Appropriate use of the increment entropy for electrophysiological time series

Journal

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 13-23

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.01.009

Keywords

Increment entropy; Complexity; Electrophysiological time series

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471157]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu [BE2017071, BE2017647]
  3. Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges of Changzhou [CZ20170018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increment entropy (IncrEn) is a new measure for quantifying the complexity of a time series. There are three critical parameters in the IncrEn calculation: N (length of the time series), m (dimensionality), and q (quantifying precision). However, the question of how to choose the most appropriate combination of IncrEn parameters for short datasets has not been extensively explored. The purpose of this research was to provide guidance on choosing suitable IncrEn parameters for short datasets by exploring the effects of varying the parameter values. We used simulated data, epileptic EEG data and cardiac interbeat (RR) data to investigate the effects of the parameters on the calculated IncrEn values. The results reveal that Mean is sensitive to changes in in, q and N for short datasets (N <= 500). However, IncrEn reaches stability at a data length of N = 1000 with m = 2 and q = 2, and for short datasets (N = 100), it shows better relative consistency with 2 <= m <= 6 and 2 <= q <= 8 We suggest that the value of N should be no less than 100. To enable a clear distinction between different classes based on IncrEn, we recommend that m and q should take values between 2 and 4. With appropriate parameters, IncrEn enables the effective detection of complexity variations in physiological time series, suggesting that IncrEn should be useful for the analysis of physiological time series in clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available