4.4 Article

The influence of temperature stress on the physiology of the Atlantic surfclam, Spisula solidissima

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.04.011

Keywords

Atlantic surfclam; Scope for growth; Thermal stress; Filtration rate; Immunity; Spisula

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS1656753]
  2. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atlantic surfclam populations have significantly declined in state and federal waters from the south shore of Long Island, New York to the Delmarva Peninsula since the early 2000s. Previous studies have demonstrated that surfclams in this geographic range show signs of physiological stress, suggested to be a result of increasing ocean temperatures. In this study, we examined the effect of 2 temperature regimes (19 degrees C and 23 degrees C) on surfclam physiology. These temperatures were chosen because they represent maximal (23 degrees C) and minimal (19 degrees C) temperatures prevailing in New York clamming areas during summer. Results demonstrated enhanced energy metabolism and significant reductions in filtration rate, scope for growth, and immune functions in clams exposed to the warmer temperature treatment. Although net energy gains remained positive in both treatments under our experimental conditions, the findings suggest that temperature stress is involved in the recent observations of surfclams in poor condition. The impact of elevated temperatures on phytoplankton quantity/quality and other environmental variables in combination with the direct impact on surfclam filtration and metabolic rates could lead to a negative energy balance. While some uncertainties remain about population-scale impacts of overall warming trends, we fear that future increases in temperature may lead to the collapse of the Atlantic surfclam between New York and Virginia, especially within inshore regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available