4.7 Article

Combined effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water and fumaric acid on the reduction of foodborne pathogens and shelf life extension of fresh pork

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages 277-284

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.019

Keywords

Pork; Slightly acidic electrolyzed water; Fumaric acid; Pathogens reduction; Shelf life

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) of Republic of Korea [13072-957]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy of the individual treatments (slightly acidic electrolyzed water [SAcEW] or fumaric acid [FA]) and their combination to reduce Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella Typhimurium in fresh pork as well as to study the shelf life and sensory quality (color, odor, and texture) of pork during storage at 4 and 10 degrees C. The inoculated pork samples (10 g) were dipped for 3 min in each treatment (tap water [TW], SAcEW, strong acidic electrolyzed water [StAEW], 0.5% FA, or SAcEW + 0.5% FA) with or without mild heat (40 degrees C). Decontamination of fresh pork with SAcEW +0.5% FA at 40 degrees C for 3 min showed greater bactericidal effect compared to other treatments, which significantly (P < 0.05) reduced E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, and S. Typhimurium by 2.59, 2.69, 2.38, and 2.99 log CFU/g, respectively. This combined treatment significantly (P <0.05) yielded in a longer lag time of naturally occurring bacteria (TBC) on pork stored at 4 degrees C. This combined treatment also prolonged the shelf life of pork up to 6 days and 4-5 days when stored at 4 degrees C and 10 degrees C, respectively, compared to those of the untreated pork. The results suggest that the combined treatment of SAcEW + 0.5% FA has potential as a novel method to enhance the microbial safety and quality of fresh pork. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available