4.2 Article

Efficacy of Ponatinib Versus Earlier Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Front-line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Journal

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 257-265

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.02.010

Keywords

Complete molecular response; Combination therapy; Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; Overall survival

Funding

  1. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complete molecular response (CMR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with front-line chemotherapy plus ponatinib versus earlier generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors were compared in a meta-analysis and meta-regression. The patients treated with front-line ponatinib versus earlier generation treatments were more likely to achieve a CMR and had greater rates of 3-year OS. Introduction: Complete molecular response (CMR) and 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) were compared for patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) who had undergone front-line combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib versus combination therapy plus earlier generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib). Patients and Methods: We identified 26 Ph+ ALL studies: 25 of earlier generation TKIs and 1 of ponatinib. The outcomes from studies of combination chemotherapy plus earlier generation TKIs were summarized using pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from a random-effects meta-analysis. A binomial distribution was assumed to calculate the 95% CIs for the results from the single-arm combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib trial. Adjusted logistic meta-regression analyses were used to compare the outcomes between the TKI groups. Results: The percentage of patients achieving a CMR was greater with combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib (79%) than the pooled percentage of patients achieving a CMR with combination chemotherapy plus earlier generation TKIs (34%). Greater OS was observed with ponatinib compared with the pooled OS for earlier generation TKIs (2-year, 83% vs. 58%; 3-year, 79% vs. 50%). Odds ratios for ponatinib versus earlier generation TKIs were 6.09 (95% CI, 1.16-31.90; P=.034) for CMR, 3.70 (95% CI, 0.93-14.73; P=.062) for 2-year OS, and 4.49 (95% CI, 1.00-20.13; P=.050) for 3-year OS. Conclusion: Ponatinib plus chemotherapy might be associated with better outcomes than chemotherapy with earlier generation TKIs in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available