4.2 Article

Comparison of Plasma Exosomes by Differential Ultracentrifugation and Solvent Precipitation Methods

Journal

CLINICAL LABORATORY
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 991-998

Publisher

CLIN LAB PUBL
DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180104

Keywords

exosomes; oral lichen planus; plasma; differential ultra-centrifugation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771080, 81371147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Emerging evidence has identified that exosomes play a pivotal role in intercellular signal transmission. However, the standardized purification techniques to isolate high quality exosomes are still deficient at present. This study was to evaluate reproducibility and efficiency of differential ultracentrifugation and solvent precipitation-based kits by isolating plasma-derived exosomes from oral lichen planus patients. Methods: Morphology, exosomal biomarkers, particle size distribution, proteomic components, and protein yield of isolated exosomes were evaluated by transmission electron microscope, western blot, laser diffraction instrument, Coomassie staining, and BCA protein assay kit, respectively. Results: TEM displayed representative cup-shaped morphology of exosomes and western blot identified exosomal biomarkers CD9 and CD63. The size distribution showed that particles by differential ultracentrifugation were mainly from 26.15 nm to 166.5 nm, while some of the particles obtained by solvent precipitation kits were larger than 1,000 nm. In addition, exosomes isolated by solvent precipitation kits showed a significantly higher amount of protein yield due to plasma albumin contamination. Conclusions: Both differential ultracentrifugation and precipitation based kits could successfully isolate plasma exosomes, and exosomes by differential ultracentrifugation were purer and more appropriate for further proteomic analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available