4.5 Article

Intravenous immunoglobulin is an effective treatment for refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 906-912

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ced.13607

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Mallinckrodt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM) is often refractory to multiple systemic medications, suggesting a need for effective alternative treatments. AimMethodsTo investigate the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on patients with refractory cutaneous DM. This was a retrospective review of 42 patients treated with IVIG for refractory cutaneous DM at our institution with clinical data available at DM diagnosis. IVIG was initiated for refractory cutaneous DM alone (n = 15) or refractory cutaneous and muscle/lung disease (n = 27) in patients with various DM subtypes. ResultsConclusionOverall, 83% of patients had cutaneous DM improvement, including 87% treated for refractory skin disease alone and 81% treated for refractory skin/muscle/lung disease. Cutaneous DM improvement occurred regardless of DM subtype, and was observed after a mean of 1.82 1.38 IVIG cycles. No statistically significant clinical predictors of IVIG response or lack of response were detected. IVIG use resulted in decreased systemic glucocorticoid exposure with or without a decrease in steroid-sparing immunosuppressive medications in 80% of patients. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and lack of objective cutaneous DM activity assessment. Use of IVIG resulted in improvement of refractory cutaneous DM in the vast majority of patients relatively soon after initiation and regardless of DM subtype or clinical manifestations. Additionally, IVIG allowed decrease or discontinuation of immunosuppressive medications in 80% of patients. These findings suggest that IVIG can be a clinically efficacious and cost-effective treatment for refractory cutaneous DM and warrants prospective study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available