4.7 Article

Multiple bioanalytical method to reveal developmental biological responses in zebrafish embryos exposed to triclocarban

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages 251-258

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.033

Keywords

Developmental toxicity; Triclocarban; Antibacterial agents; Thyroid system; Zebrafish

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21407066]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20130488]
  3. Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Jiangsu University [13JDG014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triclocarban (TCC) is a well-known antibacterial agent that is frequently detected in environmental, wildlife and human samples. The potential toxicological effects and action mechanism of TCC on vertebrate development has remained unclear. In the present study, we analyzed phenotypic alterations, thyroid hormone levels, thyroid hormone responsive genes, and proteomic profiles of zebrafish embryos after exposure to a series of concentrations of TCC from 6 h post-fertilization (hpf) to 120 hpf. The most nonlethal concentration (MNLC), lethal concentration 10% (LC-10) and lethal concentration 50% (LC50) of TCC for exposures of 96 h were 133.3 mu g/4 147.5 mu g/L and 215.8 mu g/L, respectively. Our results showed that exposure to TCC decreased heart rate, delayed yolk absorption and swim bladder development at MNLC and LC10. Exposure to MNLC of TCC inhibited thyroid hormone and altered expression of thyroid hormone responsive genes. Furthermore, exposure to 1/20 MNLC of TCC altered expression of proteins related to binding and metabolism, skeletal muscle development and function, as well as proteins involved in nervous system development and immune response, indicating TCC has potential health risks in wildlife and humans at low concentration level. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available