4.7 Article

Developmental responses of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri to heavy metals transferred across multi-trophic food chain

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 205, Issue -, Pages 690-697

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.073

Keywords

Heavy metals; Ladybird beetle; Sub-lethal effects; Survival; Fecundity; Life table

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Programs of Guangzhou, P.R. China [201509010023, 201807010019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current studies were carried out to observe the variations in development, biology and life table parameters of ladybird beetle, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, feeding on pink hibiscus mealybug (Dysmicoccus neobrevipes) contaminated with heavy metals (cadmium, lead, and nickel) bio-transferred across a multi-trophic chain. The developmental time required for immature life stages (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th instar nymphs, pupae) and total developmental period (egg-adult) differed significantly among different heavy metal treatments and control. The accumulated survival rate of C. montrouzieri immature life stages also differed significantly among different heavy metal treatments and control. Different parameters of adult female biology (Pre-oviposition period, fecundity, female longevity) were adversely affected by different heavy metals. Life table analysis revealed that all the heavy metals caused significant reduction in net reproduction rate (R-0) and intrinsic rate of increase (r) while the mean generation time (T) and doubling time (D-t) were significantly higher than control. The results obtained provide possible insight into the implications of heavy metals on the population dynamics of insect predator (C. montrouzieri) in a multitrophic food chain. However, further research is required on genetic as well as physiological processes involved in the regulation of growth and development of C. montrouzieri. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available