4.7 Article

Classification of 1-methylcyclopropene treated apples by fluorescence fingerprint using partial least squares discriminant analysis with stepwise selectivity ratio variable selection method

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 30-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.02.004

Keywords

Apple; 1-MethylCyclopropene; Fluorescence fingerprint; Partial least squares discriminant analysis; Selectivity ratio

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries under the Development of non-destructive technology evaluating various qualities of agricultural products project [13406021]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K15354] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the potential of using fluorescence fingerprint (FF) for nondestructive identification of apples treated with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP). In total, 442 apples of two cultivars (Fuji and Orin) and different storage times (0, 4, 5, 6, and 8 months) were assessed. The classification model used in this study was built using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) with the stepwise selectivity ratio (SR) method. The stepwise SR method is a recursive variable selection method proposed in this study. FF was capable of classifying 1-MCP-treated apples with accuracies of 91.23%, 89.74%, and 90.17% for calibration, cross-validation, and validation results, respectively. PLSDA with the stepwise SR method could identify four aggregations of wavelength conditions, which are important to the classification. In addition, a non-targeted approach was taken to screen the metabolites characterizing 1-MCP-treated and control apples by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The observed difference in metabolic profiles may contribute to the difference in the fluorescence profiles of 1-MCP treated and control apples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available