4.7 Article

Syngas production in high performing tubular solid oxide cells by using high-temperature H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages 41-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.110

Keywords

Co-electrolysis; Syngas production; Reverse water gas shift reaction; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Solid-oxide cells

Funding

  1. Korea CCS R AMP
  2. D Center (KCRC) - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT AMP
  3. Future Planning) [2014M1A8A1049298]
  4. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) of the Republic of Korea [20163030031850]
  5. Ministry of Trade, Industry AMP
  6. Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20163030031850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using electricity from renewable sources, high-temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis cells (SOCs) can perform advantageous conversion of H2O/CO2 to high-value syngas. In this work, we investigated the performance of tubular solid oxide co-electrolysis cells for the production of syngas by electrochemical conversion of H2O/CO2. The tubular solid-oxide electrolysis cells comprise Ni-yttria stabilized zirconia (Ni-YSZ) based fuel-electrode supported cells, a yttria or scandia-stabilized zirconia (YSZ and ScSZ) electrolyte, and a composite air-electrode of (La0.85Sr0.15)(0.9) MnO3 (LSM) and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 (LSCF). The electrochemical performance of the tubular SOCs for various operating conditions was analyzed using I-V curves, EIS analysis, and gas chromatography. From the results, we confirm the correlation between the operating conditions and the electrochemical performance of the co-electrolysis process in the tubular SOCs. Furthermore, we found that the syngas yield of the ScSZ electrolyte-based SOC cell was better than that of the YSZ electrolyte-based SOC. The results show that using a tubular SOC offered highly efficient conversion of H2O/CO2, with high yield and good-quality syngas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available