4.7 Article

Influence of pore distribution on the equivalent thermal conductivity of low porosity ceramic closed-cell foams

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 44, Issue 16, Pages 19319-19329

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.160

Keywords

Ceramic closed-cell foams; Pore distribution; Radiation; Thermal conductivity; Numerical simulation

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0310701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772222, 51474165]
  3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of Hubei Province of China [2016AHB026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microstructures of porous alumina materials with different porosities were established by introducing the departure factor of pore position and acentric factor of pore diameter to describe the distribution of pores in space and in size, respectively. The contribution of radiation and influence of pore distribution on the equivalent thermal conductivity were discussed based on numerical simulations by the finite volume method (FVM) considering both thermal conduction and radiation. When the pore diameter was less than 10 mu m, the radiation component was less than 2%, and radiation could be neglected. Radiative heat transfer played a dominant role for materials with high porosity and large pore size at high temperatures. For micro pore materials (< 100 mu m), broad pore size and non-uniform pore space distribution decreased the thermal conductivity across the entire temperature range. For materials with macro pores (> 1 mm), broad pore distribution decreased the thermal conductivity at low temperatures and increased it at high temperatures. The basic prediction model of effective thermal conductivity for a two-component material, the Maxwell Eucken model (ME1) and its modified model were corrected by introducing the pore structure factor. The results from experiments prove that the numerical values were satisfactory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available