4.7 Article

Evaluation of the concrete prisms test method for assessing the potential alkali-aggregate reactivity of recycled concrete aggregates

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 25-36

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.008

Keywords

concrete prism tests; alkali-aggregate reactivity (C); recycled concrete aggregate; residual mortar; original virgin aggregates

Funding

  1. Quebec Departement of Transportation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concrete prism test (CPT) is a widely used method for assessing the potential alkali-aggregate reactivity of any given natural aggregate. This paper presents the evaluation of the current method and its applicability to assess the alkali-silica reactivity of recycled concrete aggregates (RCA). The testing was carried out on two different types of RCA: manufactured from > 15 years old blocks disposed outdoors and from a demolished overpass infrastructure. Following the analysis of the different parameters that make RCA different than original aggregates, it has been found that the residual mortar content of the RCA particles and their absorption condition prior to their addition to mixtures are considerably important. The CPT is reliable to access RCA reactivity, however it is therefore recommended to use saturated RCA as higher expansion is obtained under these conditions. It is also recommended to use the aggregate dry rodded bulk density to determine the coarse aggregate to-sand ratio, instead of using a fixed 60 to 40 ratio. Moreover, no pessimum effect was observed using RCA; in fact, the expansion of the test prisms was increasing with increasing RCA content. The extent of damaged suffered by the concrete from which the RCA are manufactured and the geology of the original virgin aggregates incorporated in the RCA are also important parameters to consider while using the CPT to assess correctly each RCA reactivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available