4.8 Article

Ligand-triggered de-repression of Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G proteins coupled to immune receptor kinases

Journal

CELL RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 529-543

Publisher

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/s41422-018-0027-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [31521001]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2015CB910200]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB11020200]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics [SKLPG2016B-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G proteins regulate diverse processes by coupling to single-transmembrane receptors. One such receptor is the FLS2 receptor kinase, which perceives bacterial flagellin epitope flg22 to activate immunity through a class of cytoplasmic kinases called BIK1/ PBLs. Unlike animal and fungal heterotrimeric G proteins that are activated by a ligand-induced guanine nucleotide exchange activity of seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), plant heterotrimeric G proteins are self-activating. How plant receptors regulate heterotrimeric G proteins in response to external ligands remains unknown. Here we show that RGS1, a GTPase accelerating protein, maintains Arabidopsis G proteins in an inactive state in complex with FLS2. Activation of FLS2 by flg22 induces a BIK1/ PBL-mediated phosphorylation of RGS1 at Ser428 and Ser431 and that promotes RGS1 dissociation from the FLS2-G protein complex. This relieves G proteins from the RGS1-mediated repression and enables positive regulation of immune signaling. We additionally show that RGS1 is similarly regulated by multiple immune receptors. Our results uncover ligand-induced de-repression as a mechanism for G protein signaling in plants that is distinct from previously reported mechanism underlying the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins in other systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available