4.7 Article

Stochastic hydro-mechanical stability of vegetated slopes: An integrated copula based framework

Journal

CATENA
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 124-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.09.009

Keywords

Vegetated soil; Suction; Correlation; Copula; Dependence structure; Probability distribution function; Probability of failure; Reliability

Funding

  1. Shantou University [NTF17007]
  2. Research Grants Council, Hong Kong [T22-603/15N, HKUST6/CRF/12R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vegetation induces considerable uncertainties in the hydrological (suction, psi) and mechanical (cohesion, c and frictional angle, phi) parameters of soil, due to which, it is essential that the stability of vegetated slope is evaluated in a probabilistic framework. Moreover, from previous studies, it has been found that the mechanical parameters of soil share inherent correlation, which has a profound effect on slope stability. The combined effect of stochastic hydro-mechanical parameters is not well studied, more so in vegetated slopes. This study demonstrates a probabilistic approach to analyse the stability of vegetated slopes, under the combined effect of univariate suction and bivariate c - phi. Data corresponding to suction and the mechanical parameters, are obtained from a field monitoring programme, conducted on a homogeneously compacted vegetated slope (adopted from previous literature). The suction responses are probabilistically evaluated by estimating their probability distribution functions, and the dependence structure of c and phi is established via copula theory. Treed slopes are found to be more stable than grassed and bare (i.e. sparsely vegetated) slopes, since suction induced in treed soil is relatively higher. The probability of failure for vegetated slopes decreases substantially with increase in magnitude of c - phi correlation, thereby yielding more conservative estimates than the uncorrelated case.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available