Journal
CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 305, Issue -, Pages 133-142Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.08.043
Keywords
Nickel catalysts; SBA-15; EDTA; Deposition-precipitation; Hydrogenation; Naphthalene
Funding
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT, Mexico) [220175, CVU421070]
- DGAPA-UNAM, Mexico (PAPIIT) [IN-113715]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The SBA-15 material was synthesized and used as a support for nickel catalysts with 4 and 10 wt.% metal loadings. Three preparation methods were used: a conventional incipient wetness impregnation with a nickel(II) nitrate solution (IM method), impregnation with a [Ni(EDTA)](2-) complex solution (ED method) and deposition-precipitation with urea (DP method). The support and catalysts were characterized by N-2 physisorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and temperature-programmed reduction. The reduced nickel catalysts were also characterized by high resolution transmission electron microscopy and powder XRD. Catalysts were evaluated in the hydrogenation of naphthalene in order to compare their catalytic performance (activity and selectivity). The obtained results show that the preparation method affected the dispersion and size distribution of nickel nanoparticles deposited on the SBA-15 surface as well as the degree of their reduction. ED and DP methods led to a better dispersion of Ni and higher hydrogenation activity in comparison with the conventional IM procedure. In addition, the catalysts' selectivity to decalins and their ability to isomerize cis-decalin to trans-decalin were also affected by the preparation method used, increasing in the following order: XNS-IM < XNS-DP < XNS-ED for both Ni loadings (4 and 10 wt.%). Therefore, the importance of the method used for the preparation of the Ni/SBA-15 catalysts was demonstrated.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available