4.8 Article

High-power positive electrode based on synergistic effect of N- and WO3 -decorated carbon felt for vanadium redox flow batteries

Journal

CARBON
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 444-453

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.038

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program
  2. M2E [2017SGR1246]
  3. Fundacion Ramon Areces funding through BAT-LIMET project
  4. MINECO [ENE2016-80788-C5-5-R]
  5. Spanish government [FJCI-2014-19745]
  6. Iranian National Committee of Nanotechnology in Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
  7. office of Vice Chancellor in Charge of Research of University of Tabriz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries (VRFB) are suitable for grid-scale applications, their power-related cost must be reduced in order to boost the use of this technology in the market, allowing their widespread commercialization. One effective way to make the VRFB a competitive and viable solution could be through new strategies for improving the electrocatalytic activity of the electrodes with enhanced electrolyte/electrode interface characteristics. Herein, we report the synergistic effect demonstrated by N- and WO3- decorated carbon-based positive electrode, named HTNW electrode, which demonstrates the feasibility of achieving: i) enhanced electrocatalytic activity, achieving large current density and high reversibility towards VO2+/VO2+ couple (promotion of oxygen and electron transfer processes), ii) decrement of the electron-transfer resistance from 76.18 Omega to 13.00 Omega for the pristine electrode and HTNW electrodes, respectively; iii) 51% of the electrolyte utilization ratio at high rates (i.e. 200 mA cm(-2)) with 70% of energy efficiency; iv) increment of more than 50% of the power-peak in comparison with pristine electrode. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available