4.7 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: EMP3, which is regulated by miR-663a, suppresses gallbladder cancer progression via interference with the MAPK/ERK pathway (Retracted article. See vol. 549, 2022)

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 430, Issue -, Pages 97-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.022

Keywords

EMP3; Gallbladder cancer; miR-663a; MAPK/ERK

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research Foundation [17DZ2260200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773043, 31501127]
  3. development fund for Shanghai talents [201608]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract and its molecular pathogenesis is poorly understood. Aberrant expression of epithelial membrane protein-3 (EMP3) was reported in different kinds of cancers. Our study aimed to explore the elusive functional roles and the underlying molecular mechanisms of EMP3 with respect to GBC progression. The results showed that human GBC tissues exhibited decreased levels of EMP3 compared with non-malignant tissues. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that low expression of EMP3 was associated with poor prognosis of GBC patients. Upregulation of EMP3 repressed GBC cell proliferation, migration and invasion both in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, EMP3 silencing promoted GBC cell growth and metastasis. Additionally, we found that EMP3 was a target gene of miR-663a, and downregulation of EMP3 in GBC was attributed to the overexpression of miR-663a. Furthermore, miR-663a was proven to be a tumor-promoting factor mediating GBC development. Finally, we demonstrated that downregulation of EMP3 activated MAPK/ERK signaling, which modulated GBC progression. These data showed the mechanism by which EMP3 suppresses GBC progression, suggesting that the miR-663a/EMP3/MAPK/ERK axis may be a novel therapeutic target for GBC treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available