Clinical and economic burden associated with stage III to IV triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare historical cohort study in elderly women in the United States
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Clinical and economic burden associated with stage III to IV triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare historical cohort study in elderly women in the United States
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CANCER
Volume 124, Issue 10, Pages 2104-2114
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-03-06
DOI
10.1002/cncr.31299
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- National Health Expenditure Projections, 2016–25: Price Increases, Aging Push Sector To 20 Percent Of Economy
- (2017) Sean P. Keehan et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Prevalence and Safety of Off-Label Use of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Older Patients With Breast Cancer: Estimates From SEER-Medicare Data
- (2016) Anne A. Eaton et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- An overview of triple-negative breast cancer
- (2015) Pankaj Kumar et al. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
- Racial differences in outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer by disease subtype
- (2015) Ines Vaz-Luis et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State
- (2015) Betsy A. Kohler et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Age-Related Disparity in Immediate Prognosis of Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study from SEER Cancer Registries
- (2015) Wenjie Zhu et al. PLoS One
- The role of taxanes in triple-negative breast cancer: literature review
- (2015) Giorgio Mustacchi et al. Drug Design Development and Therapy
- Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State
- (2015) Betsy A. Kohler et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- US Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes Defined by Joint Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status
- (2014) Nadia Howlader et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Outcome of metastatic breast cancer in selected women with or without deleterious BRCA mutations
- (2013) S. Bayraktar et al. CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS
- The Management of Early-Stage and Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- (2013) Carey K. Anders et al. HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
- Refusing Treatment
- (2013) M. Frenkel ONCOLOGIST
- Patterns of treatment, healthcare utilization and costs by lines of therapy in metastatic breast cancer in a large insured US population
- (2013) Saurabh Ray et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Optimal strategies for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with currently approved agents
- (2012) F. Andre et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Patient survival and healthcare utilization costs after diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer in a United States managed care cancer registry
- (2012) Onur Baser et al. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
- Age-Specific Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Understanding the Black–White Crossover
- (2012) Christina A. Clarke et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- The Influence of Comorbidities on Overall Survival Among Older Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
- (2011) J. L. Patnaik et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Management of triple negative breast cancer
- (2010) Catherine Oakman et al. BREAST
- Cost of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients in the United States
- (2008) K. Robin Yabroff et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started