4.7 Article

Effects of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological responses to building noise

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 302-311

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.061

Keywords

Noise sensitivity; Psychophysiological responses; Building noise; Floor impact noise

Funding

  1. Residential Environment Research Program - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean Government [18RERP-B082204-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aims to explore the effects of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological responses to floor impact noises and road traffic noise. A standard impact source (i.e. an impact ball) and two real impact sources (i.e. an adult's walking and a child's running) were used to record floor impact noises, while road traffic noise was introduced as an outdoor noise stimulus. A total of 34 subjects were recruited based on their self-rated noise sensitivity and classified into low and high noise sensitivity groups. During the laboratory experiments, all the noise stimuli were presented for 5 min each, and the subjects rated their annoyance with each stimulus at the end of each.session. Their physiological responses (heart rate: HR, electrodermal activity: EDA, and respiratory rate: RR) were measured throughout the experiment. The obtained noise annoyance ratings increased with increasing noise levels for all the sources, and the high noise sensitivity group exhibited higher annoyance ratings than the low noise sensitivity group. All physiological measures varied significantly with the duration of noise exposure. In particular, the EDA and RR values decreased sharply after 30 s, demonstrating strong habituation over time. Noise sensitivity was found to significantly affect physiological responses, whereas noise levels showed no significant influence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available