4.7 Article

Height and overall cancer risk and mortality: evidence from a Mendelian randomisation study on 310,000 UK Biobank participants

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 118, Issue 9, Pages 1262-1267

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0063-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1123248]
  2. University of Queensland
  3. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. NHMRC
  6. MRC [MC_PC_12028] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Observational studies have shown that being taller is associated with greater cancer risk. However, the interpretation of such studies can be hampered by important issues such as confounding and reporting bias. METHODS: We used the UK Biobank resource to develop genetic predictors of height and applied these in a Mendelian randomisation framework to estimate the causal relationship between height and cancer. Up to 438,870 UK Biobank participants were considered in our analysis. We addressed two primary cancer outcomes, cancer incidence by age similar to 60 and cancer mortality by age similar to 60 (where age similar to 60 is the typical age of UK Biobank participants). RESULTS: We found that each genetically predicted 9 cm increase in height conferred an odds ratio of 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.07-1.13) and 1.09 (1.02-1.16) for diagnosis of any cancer and death from any cancer, respectively. For both risk and mortality, the effect was larger in females than in males. CONCLUSIONS: Height increases the risk of being diagnosed with and dying from cancer. These findings from Mendelian randomisation analyses agree with observational studies and provide evidence that they were not likely to have been strongly affected by confounding or reporting bias.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available