4.5 Article

Quenching distance measurement of highly to mildly flammable compounds

Journal

FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 58-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.11.013

Keywords

Low GWP alternatives; Refrigerants; Quenching distance; Minimum flame radius; Minimum ignition energy; Burning velocity; Microgravity

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quenching distance measurements were carried out for 11 highly to only mildly flammable gases (which include alkanes, fluorinated alkanes and alkenes, and ammonia) to elucidate the ignition and quenching characteristics of low-GWP (global warming potential) alternative materials. For buoyant flames of mildly flammable compounds, conventional 25 mm diameter parallel plates in the vertical position provided significantly smaller quenching distance (d(q),) than 100 mm diameter plates in the horizontal position. A good correlation was obtained between the quenching distance (d(q,h) in mm) measured by the latter test apparatus and the maximum burning velocity (Suo,max in cm) for these compounds: d(q,h) = 58.12(rho S-u(u0), max)(-0.926), where rho(u) is the unburned gas density. The mildly flammable compounds that have Suo,max below 10 cm s(-1) have a dq more than three times larger than that of propane. Initial development of the schlieren flame radius was observed for mildly flammable CH2F2/air mixture using thin electrodes and a variety of spark energies. It was confirmed that the parallel plate quenching distance was essentially equal to the minimum flame diameter in a free space. By applying the measured d(q,h) and Suo,max in the simplified heat loss theory, the minimum ignition energy (E-min in mJ) was expressed by E-min = 0.0712d(q,h)(2.97). The results showed that the mildly flammable compounds have Emu, that is more than an order of magnitude greater than that of propane. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available