4.5 Article

Personal and clinical social support and adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients in an integrated health care system

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 170, Issue 3, Pages 623-631

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4774-2

Keywords

Social support; Breast cancer; Adjuvant endocrine therapy; Non-adherence; Women

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [K07 CA187403, R01 CA105274, U01 CA195565]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated associations between personal and clinical social support and non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in a large, Northern California breast cancer (BC) cohort from an integrated healthcare network. This study included 3382 women from the Pathways Study diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 with stages I-III hormone receptor-positive BC and who responded to the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support and Interpersonal Processes of Care surveys, approximately 2 months post-diagnosis. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations between tertiles of social support and non-initiation (< 2 consecutive prescription fills within a year after diagnosis). Among those who initiated treatment, we used proportional hazards regression to evaluate associations with discontinuation (ae 90 day gap) and non-adherence (< 80% medical possession ratio). Of those who initiated AET (79%), approximately one-fourth either discontinued AET or were non-adherent. AET non-initiation was more likely in women with moderate (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.96-1.46) or low (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.62) versus high personal social support (P trend = 0.02). Women with moderate (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.45) or low (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.60) personal social support were also more likely to discontinue treatment (P trend = 0.01). Furthermore, women with moderate (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53) or low (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.70) personal social support had higher non-adherence (P trend = 0.007). Associations with clinical social support and outcomes were similar. Notably, high clinical social support mitigated the risk of discontinuation when patients' personal support was moderate or low (P value = 0.04). Women with low personal or clinical social support had higher AET non-adherence. Clinician teams may need to fill support gaps that compromise treatment adherence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Oncology

Muscle Radiodensity and Mortality in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Candyce H. Kroenke, Carla M. Prado, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, Erin K. Weltzien, Jingjie Xiao, Elizabeth M. Cespedes Feliciano, Bette J. Caan

CANCER (2018)

Article Oncology

Prediagnosis social support, social integration, living status, and colorectal cancer mortality in postmenopausal women from the women's health initiative

Candyce H. Kroenke, Electra D. Paskett, Crystal W. Cene, Bette J. Caan, Juhua Luo, Aladdin H. Shadyab, Jamaica R. M. Robinson, Rami Nassir, Dorothy S. Lane, Garnet L. Anderson

CANCER (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Egocentric social networks, lifestyle behaviors, and body size in the Asian Community Health Initiative (CHI) cohort

Candyce H. Kroenke, Gem M. Le, Shannon M. Conroy, Alison J. Canchola, Salma Shariff-Marco, Scarlett Lin Gomez

PLOS ONE (2020)

Article Oncology

Metabolic syndrome risk components and mortality after triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative

Yuan Yuan, Kathy Pan, Joanne Mortimer, Rowan T. Chlebowski, Juhua Luo, Jessica E. Yan, Susan E. Yost, Candyce H. Kroenke, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Rami Nassir, Yangbo Sun, Aladdin H. Shadyab, Mara Z. Vitolins, Nazmus Saquib, Robert A. Wild, JoAnn E. Manson, Rebecca A. Nelson

Summary: In postmenopausal women with triple-negative breast cancer and 3 or 4 MetS risk components, there is a significantly higher risk of breast cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality, indicating the negative impact of metabolic risk factors on mortality outcomes.

CANCER (2021)

Article Oncology

Individual- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and risk of aggressive breast cancer subtypes in a pooled cohort of women from Kaiser Permanente Northern California

Rhonda-Lee F. Aoki, Stephen P. Uong, Scarlett Lin Gomez, Stacey E. Alexeeff, Bette J. Caan, Lawrence H. Kushi, Jacqueline M. Torres, Alice Guan, Alison J. Canchola, Brittany N. Morey, Katherine Lin, Candyce H. Kroenke

Summary: The study found that low neighborhood-level socioeconomic status is significantly associated with LumB and TNBC subtypes, while individual education is only associated with the Her2-e subtype, and individual income is not significantly associated with any breast cancer subtype.

CANCER (2021)

Article Geriatrics & Gerontology

Optimism, lifestyle, and longevity in a racially diverse cohort of women

Hayami K. Koga, Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald, Lewina O. Lee, Peter James, Candyce Kroenke, Lorena Garcia, Aladdin H. Shadyab, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, JoAnn E. Manson, Francine Grodstein, Laura D. Kubzansky

Summary: Research has found a link between optimism and healthy aging and exceptional longevity, but this association may vary across different racial and ethical groups. Lifestyle factors partially mediate the association between optimism and lifespan.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY (2022)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Does the Hispanic Mortality Advantage Vary by Marital Status Among Postmenopausal Women in the Women's Health Initiative?

Melissa Flores, John M. Ruiz, Emily A. Butler, David A. Sbarra, David O. Garcia, Lindsay Kohler, Tracy E. Crane, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Viola Benavente, Candyce H. Kroenke, Nazmus Saquib, Cynthia A. Thomson

Summary: This study found that older Hispanic women have a higher survival rate compared to non-Hispanic Whites and other racial-ethnic groups, after controlling for socioeconomic status and health controls. Despite a higher divorce rate, Hispanics did not show a significant interactive effect of race-ethnicity and marital status on survival.

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (2021)

No Data Available