Economic analysis of three interventions of different intensity in improving school implementation of a government healthy canteen policy in Australia: costs, incremental and relative cost effectiveness
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Economic analysis of three interventions of different intensity in improving school implementation of a government healthy canteen policy in Australia: costs, incremental and relative cost effectiveness
Authors
Keywords
Economic evaluation, Implementation strategies, Healthy eating policies, Childhood obesity
Journal
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-04-04
DOI
10.1186/s12889-018-5315-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Multi-strategic intervention to enhance implementation of healthy canteen policy: a randomised controlled trial
- (2017) Luke Wolfenden et al. Implementation Science
- CAFÉ: a multicomponent audit and feedback intervention to improve implementation of healthy food policy in primary school canteens: a randomised controlled trial
- (2016) Sze Lin Yoong et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to enhance implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: a randomised controlled trial
- (2016) Nicole Nathan et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- School canteens: A systematic review of the policy, perceptions and use from an Australian perspective
- (2016) Tanya Lawlis et al. Nutrition & Dietetics
- Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013
- (2015) Mohammad H Forouzanfar et al. LANCET
- Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity-related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments
- (2015) S. L. Mayne et al. Obesity Reviews
- Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews
- (2015) Rosa Lau et al. BMJ Open
- A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: study protocol
- (2014) Luke Wolfenden et al. Implementation Science
- Predictors of positive outcomes of a school food provision policy in Australia
- (2013) S. Pettigrew et al. HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL
- School food and nutrition policy, monitoring and evaluation in the USA
- (2012) Jay Hirschman et al. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
- The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity
- (2010) D. Withrow et al. Obesity Reviews
- Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Obesity (ACE-Obesity): an overview of the ACE approach, economic methods and cost results
- (2009) Rob Carter et al. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
- Adult Vaccination Strategies for the Control of Pertussis in the United States: An Economic Evaluation Including the Dynamic Population Effects
- (2009) Laurent Coudeville et al. PLoS One
- A new strategy to improve the cost-effectiveness of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and syphilis testing of blood donations in sub-Saharan Africa: a pilot study in Burkina Faso
- (2009) Dramane Kania et al. TRANSFUSION
- Strategies for the prevention and control of obesity in the school setting: systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2008) D L Katz et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
- Cost-Effectiveness of a School-Based Obesity Prevention Program
- (2008) Li Yan Wang et al. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started